자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

So now we all know the whole process of bitcoin functioning and the way Bitcoins can be utilized for making all types of real transactions. Bitcoins are exchangeable for fiat foreign money by way of cryptocurrency exchanges and can be used to make purchases from merchants and retailers that accept them. Greg Sanders: Yeah, if I can bounce in. Mark Erhardt: So I’m questioning, considered one of the problems that appears to leap out once i hear you talking about this is, what if one aspect retains making updates but not concluding it? And we’ve all the time gone back and forth between those, because we don’t know if we should always do a less complicated version first and watch for later to do a way more advanced model, or if we should always just soar to the extra complex model right now. Because we’ve all the time been discussing the truth that saying, having the channel announcement point to a selected onchain output, was fairly bad for privacy and that we could in all probability do higher. So, those are issues that we’ve at all times been just hand-wavy about how we would do this in the future. Read More: Amid value drops and elevated regulation, what’s the future of cryptocurrency?

But I don’t assume we’ll permit you to have any form of multiplier, because certainly one of the opposite ideas was that you could possibly also simply announce some UTXOs that you just personal, with the proof that you just own them, with a complete value of, for instance, 2 bitcoin, after which that will grant you the ability to announce as much as X instances that in channels with out having to level to any specific onchain output. I didn’t suppose it was too bad, however the one key difference right here is that for the fee channels with penalties as presently designed, it’s necessitating that you just retailer these secret nonces perpetually till channel close. These charts are cardinal a part of the entire affair as with them traders are ready to foretell the motion close to accuracy. But, realizing that the markets by no means shut is a useful safeguard to have. When you've got one other Lightning-like channel specification that you just coded up or a custom channel kind, you too can embrace that in this channel announcement and it will simply work. That’s why we’re not doing that proper now, and that’s why most people will just keep announcing the output that basically corresponds to the channel so that when it gets spent, folks actually discover it and might take away it from that graph and know that they can't route by way of that channel anymore.

I feel we’re going to stick to a easy model, the place you permit pointing to any type of output to pay to your channel. PTLC fixes that by making sure that as a substitute of using the preimage of a SHA256 hash and https://youtu.be/IJ1P-0ILN8k its hash, we’re going to use elliptic curve factors and their personal keys. This may seem unnecessary given that BIP32 already gives prolonged non-public keys (xprvs) that may be shared between signing wallets. Maybe we will start with t-bast. Can the channel keep open when the UTXO will get spent? And however, how do you make it possible for the same UTXO isn't reused for the announcement; and what occurs if that UTXO gets spent? So, will we should be maintaining track of the UTXO actually not being moved while it's the stand-in to have announced the channel? Mike Schmidt: The taproot and MuSig2 channel discussion considerably leads into the updated channel announcement dialogue and how gossip protocol would should be upgraded in an effort to assist transferring to P2TR outputs. So, we need to vary that, because we want to permit taproot, which suggests permitting additionally enter, particularly if we use MuSig2; we don’t need to reveal the inner keys.

And proper now, it’s going to make use of the same cost hash with all these nodes, which means that if someone owns two of the nodes in the trail, they are learning data, and this is unhealthy for privacy. Right now, everytime you ship a payment, this cost is going to go through multiple nodes on the network. Bastien Teinturier: Sure. So right now, after we introduced the channel on the community, we explicitly introduced node IDs and the Bitcoin keys which might be contained in the multisig 2-of-2, and other people verified that the output that we are referencing is definitely locked with the script hash of multisig 2-of-2 of these two keys, so you can only use it with scripts that really observe the format of Lightning channels without taproot. Mike Schmidt: Murch or t-bast, any other feedback on taproot and MuSig2 channels? Mike Schmidt: Go ahead, Murch. Mike Schmidt: Next section from the Summit mentioned PTLCs and redundant overpayments. Bastien Teinturier: Okay, so PTLCs are a change that's allowed by taproot and adaptor signatures.